Статья: Клинические рекомендации. Мочекаменная болезнь (2020)

Читать

Статья Литература Выпуск Издательство

Читать онлайн

В статье описываются Клинические рекомендации. Мочекаменная болезнь

Ключевые фразы: мочекаменная болезнь

Автор (ы): МАРТОВ АЛЕКСЕЙ ГЕОРГИЕВИЧ, ХАРЧИЛАВА РЕВАЗ РЕВАЗОВИ, АКОПЯН ГАГИК НЕРСЕСОВИЧ

Журнал: ВОПРОСЫ УРОЛОГИИ И АНДРОЛОГИИ

Идентификаторы и классификаторы

УДК: 611.62. Мочевой пузырь. Мочеиспускательный канал

Для цитирования:

МАРТОВ А. Г., ХАРЧИЛАВА Р. Р., АКОПЯН Г. Н. КЛИНИЧЕСКИЕ РЕКОМЕНДАЦИИ. МОЧЕКАМЕННАЯ БОЛЕЗНЬ // ВОПРОСЫ УРОЛОГИИ И АНДРОЛОГИИ. 2020. № 3, ТОМ 8

Текстовый фрагмент статьи

Список литературы

Strohmaier W. Epidemiologie und Pathogenese der Urolithiasis. Die Urologie. Part of the series Springer Reference Medizin. 2016: 473-478. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642- 39940-4_43
Бакетин ПС, Моллаев РА, Мазуренко ДА, Григорьев ВЕ, Гаджиев НК, Обидняк ВМ, и др. Патогенетические варианты мочекаменной болезни. Педиатр. 2017; 8(1):89-99. DOI: 10.17816/PED8195-105 / Baketin PC, Mollaev RA, Mazurenko DА, Grigoryev VЕ, Gadzhiev NК, Obidnyak VМ, et al. Pathogenic variants of urolithiasis. Pediatrician. 2017; 8(1):95-105. DOI: 10.17816/PED8195-105 (In Russian).
Coe FL, Evan AP, Worcester EM, Lingeman JE. Three pathways for human kidney stone formation. Urol Res. 2010 Jun;38(3):147-60. doi: 10.1007/s00240-010-0271- 8. Epub 2010 Apr 22. PMID: 20411383; PMCID: PMC3169174.
Evan AP, Lingeman J, Coe F, Shao Y, Miller N, Matlaga B, Phillips C, Sommer A, Worcester E. Renal histopathology of stone-forming patients with distal renal tubular acidosis. Kidney Int. 2007 Apr;71(8):795-801. doi: 10.1038/sj.ki.5002113. Epub 2007 Jan 31. PMID: 17264873.
Kok DJ, Khan SR. Calcium oxalate nephrolithiasis, a free or fixed particle disease.
Kidney Int. 1994 Sep;46(3):847-54. doi: 10.1038/ki.1994.341. PMID: 7996806.
Белай СИ, Довбыш МА, Белай ИМ. Мочекаменная болезнь: актуальность вопроса и перспективы его развития. Вестник ВГМУ. Украина. 2016; 15(5):19- 26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22263/2312-4156.2016.5.19 / Bilai SI, Dovbysh MA, Bilai IM. Urolithiasis: urgency of this matter and prospects for its development. Ukraine Vestnik VGMU. 2016;15(5):19-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22263/2312- 4156.2016.5.19 (In Russian).
Борисов ВВ. Мочекаменная болезнь. Терапия больных камнями почек и мочеточников. М., 2011. / Borisov VV. Mochekamennaya bolezn’. Terapiya bol’nykh kamnyami pochek i mochetochnikov. M., 2011. (In Russian).
Trinchieri A, Curhan G, Karlsen S, Jun Wu К. Epidemiology. Stone Disease. Paris: Health Publications, 2003; 3–30.
Stamatelou KK, Francis ME, Jones CA, Nyberg LM, Curhan GC. Time trends in reported prevalence of kidney stones in the United States: 1976-1994. Kidney Int. 2003 May;63(5):1817-23. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2003.00917.x. PMID: 12675858.
Trinchieri A, Ostini F, Nespoli R, Rovera F, Montanari E, Zanetti G. A prospective study of recurrence rate and risk factors for recurrence after a first renal stone. J Urol. 1999 Jul;162(1):27-30. doi: 10.1097/00005392-199907000-00007. PMID: 10379732.
Rule A.D., Lieske J.C., Li X., Melton L.J.3rd., Krambeck A.E., et al. The ROKS nomogram for predicting a second symptomatic stone episode.
Гаджиев НК, Бровкин СС, Григорьев ВЕ, Дмитриев ВВ, Малхасян ВА, Шкарупа ДД, и др. Метафилактика мочекаменной болезни: новый взгляд, современный подход, мобильная реализация. Урология. 2017;1:124-129. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18565/urol.2017.1.124-1299 / Gadzhiev NK, Brovkin SS, Grigor’ev VE, Dmitriev VV, Malkhasyan VA, Shkarupa DD, i dr. Metafilaktika mochekamennoi bolezni: novyi vzglyad, sovremennyi podkhod, mobil’naya realizatsiya. Urologiya. 2017;1:124-129. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18565/urol.2017.1.124-129 (In
Russian).
Hesse A, Brändle E, Wilbert D, Köhrmann KU, Alken P. Study on the prevalence and incidence of urolithiasis in Germany comparing the years 1979 vs. 2000. Eur Urol. 2003 Dec;44(6):709-13. doi: 10.
Leusmann DB. Whewellite, weddellite and company: where do all the strange names originate? BJU Int. 2000 Sep;86(4):411-3. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.2000.00860.x. PMID: 10971263.
Leusmann DB, Blaschke R, Schmandt W. Results of 5,035 stone analyses: a contribution to epidemiology of urinary stone disease. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 1990;24(3):205-10. doi: 10.3109/00365599009180859. PMID: 2237297.
Kim SC, Burns EK, Lingeman JE, Paterson RF, McAteer JA, Williams JC Jr. Cystine calculi: correlation of CT-visible structure, CT number, and stone morphology with fragmentation by shock wave lithotripsy. Urol Res. 2007 Dec;35(6):319-24. doi: 10.1007/s00240-007-0117-1. Epub 2007 Oct 27. PMID: 17965956.
Perlmutter AE, Talug C, Tarry WF, Zaslau S, Mohseni H, Kandzari SJ. Impact of stone location on success rates of endoscopic lithotripsy for nephrolithiasis. Urology. 2008 Feb;71(2):214-7. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.09.023. PMID: 18308086.
Eisner BH, Reese A, Sheth S, Stoller ML. Ureteral stone location at emergency room presentation with colic. J Urol. 2009 Jul;182(1):165-8. doi: 10.1016/j. juro.2009.02.131. Epub 2009 May 17. PMID: 19450856.
Segura JW, Preminger GM, Assimos DG, Dretler SP, Kahn RI, Lingeman JE, Macaluso JN Jr. Ureteral Stones Clinical Guidelines Panel summary report on the management of ureteral calculi. The American Urological Association. J Urol. 1997 Nov;158(5):1915-21. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(01)64173-9. PMID: 9334635.
Chung BI, Aron M, Hegarty NJ, Desai MM. Ureteroscopic versus percutaneous treatment for medium-size (1-2-cm) renal calculi. J Endourol. 2008 Feb;22(2):343- 6. doi: 10.1089/end.2006.9865. PMID: 18294042.
Keoghane S, Walmsley B, Hodgson D. The natural history of untreated renal tract calculi. BJU Int. 2010 Jun;105(12):1627-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09389.x. Epub 2010 Apr 29. PMID: 20438563.
Straub M, Strohmaier WL, Berg W, Beck B, Hoppe B, Laube N, Lahme S, Schmidt M, Hesse A, Koehrmann KU. Diagnosis and metaphylaxis of stone disease. Consensus concept of the National Working Committee on Stone Disease for the upcoming German Urolithiasis Guideline. World J Urol. 2005 Nov;23(5):309-23. doi: 10.1007/s00345-005-0029-z. Epub 2005 Nov 29. PMID: 16315051.
Hesse A., Tiselius B.H., Siener S.R., et al. Urinary Stones, Diagnosis, Treatment and Prevention of Recurrence. 3rd edition. 2009, Basel.
Basiri A, Shakhssalim N, Khoshdel AR, Javaherforooshzadeh A, Basiri H, Radfar MH, Dorraj N. Familial relations and recurrence pattern in nephrolithiasis: new words about old subjects. Urol J. 2010 Jun 10;7(2):81-6. PMID: 20535692.
Goldfarb DS, Fischer ME, Keich Y, Goldberg J. A twin study of genetic and dietary influences on nephrolithiasis: a report from the Vietnam Era Twin (VET) Registry. Kidney Int. 2005 Mar;67(3):1053-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2005.00170.x. PMID: 15698445.
Asplin JR, Coe FL. Hyperoxaluria in kidney stone formers treated with modern bariatric surgery. J Urol. 2007 Feb;177(2):565-9. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.09.033. PMID: 17222634.
Gonzalez RD, Canales BK. Kidney stone risk following modern bariatric surgery.
Curr Urol Rep. 2014 May;15(5):401. doi: 10.1007/s11934-014-0401-x. PMID: 24658828; PMCID: PMC4058764.
Rendina D, De Filippo G. D“Elia L, Strazzullo P. Metabolic syndrome and nephrolithiasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the scientific evidence. J Nephrol. 2014; 27(4):371-6. doi: 10.1007/s40620-014-0085-9
Dell“Orto VG, Belotti EA, Goeggel-Simonetti B, Simonetti GD, Ramelli GP, et al. Metabolic disturbances and renal stone promotion on treatment with topiramate: a systematic review. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2014; 77 (6):958-64. doi: 10.1111/ bcp.12283
Mufti UB, Nalagatla SK. Nephrolithiasis in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. J Endourol. 2010; 24(10):1557-61. doi: 10.1089/end.2010.0093.
Chen Y, DeVivo MJ, Roseman JM. Current trend and risk factors for kidney stones in persons with spinal cord injury: a longitudinal study. Spinal Cord. 2000 Jun;38(6):346-53. doi: 10.1038/sj.sc.3101008. PMID: 10889563.
Hara A, Yang WY, Petit T, Zhang ZY, Gu YM, Wei FF, Jacobs L, Odili AN, Thijs L, Nawrot TS, Staessen JA. Incidence of nephrolithiasis in relation to environmental exposure to lead and cadmium in a population study. Environ Res. 2016 Feb;145:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2015.11.013. Epub 2015 Nov 21. PMID: 26613344.
Wimpissinger F, Türk C, Kheyfets O, Stackl W. The silence of the stones: asymptomatic ureteral calculi. J Urol. 2007 Oct;178(4 Pt 1):1341-4; discussion 1344. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.05.128. Epub 2007 Aug 16. PMID: 17706721.
Türk C, Skolarikos A, Neisius A, Petřík A, Seitz C, Thomas K. EAU Guidelines. Urolithiasis. presented at the EAU Annual Congress Barcelona 2019. ISBN 978-94- 92671-04-2. http s://uroweb.org/guideline/urolithiasis/
Plot C, Evliyaoglu O, Erkan REC, Başturk A, Tugrul Çakır, Aslaner A et al. Comparison of urine microscopy and urine culture results of patients considered to have urinary tract infection. Am J Exp Clin Res. 2015; 2(3): 118-20.
Parmar MS. Kidney stones. BMJ. 2004 Jun 12;328(7453):1420-4. doi: 10.1136/ bmj.328.7453.1420. PMID: 15191979; PMCID: PMC421787.
Miller NL, Lingeman JE. Management of kidney stones. BMJ. 2007; 334 (7591):468- 72. doi : 10.1136/bmj.39113.480185.80.
Pearle MS, Asplin JR, Coe FL, Rodregs A, Worcester EM. Medical management of urolithiasis. 2nd International consultation on Stone Disease. Health Publications, 2008.
Matlaga BR, Shah OD, Assimos DG. Drug-induced urinary calculi. Rev Urol. 2003 Fall;5(4):227- 31.
Wimpissinger F, Türk C, Kheyfets O, Stackl W. The silence of the stones: asymptomatic ureteral calculi. J Urol. 2007; 178 (4):1341-4.
Bonkat G. (Co-chair), Pickard R. (Co-chair), Bartoletti R, et al., EAU Guidelines on Urological Infections, in EAU Guidelines, Edn. published as the 32nd EAU Annual Meeting, London, E.A.o.U.G. Office, Editor. 2017, European Association of Urology Guidelines Office: Arnhem, The Netherlands.
Worster A, Preyra I, Weaver B, Haines T. The accuracy of noncontrast helical computed tomography versus intravenous pyelography in the diagnosis of suspected acute urolithiasis: a meta-analysis. Ann Emerg Med. 2002; 40 (3):280-6.
Miller OF, Rineer SK, Reichard SR, Buckley RG, Donovan MS, et al. Prospective comparison of unenhanced spiral computed tomography and intravenous urogram in the evaluation of acute flank pain. Urology. 1998; 52 (6):982-7.
Yilmaz S, Sindel T, Arslan G, Ozkaynak C, Karaali K, et al. Renal colic: comparison of spiral CT, US and IVU in the detection of ureteral calculi. Eur Radiol. 1998; 8 (2):212-7. doi: 10.1007/s003300050364.
Smith RC, Rosenfield AT, Choe KA, Essenmacher KR, Verga M, et al. Acute flank pain: comparison of non-contrast-enhanced CT and intravenous urography. Radiology. 1995; 194 (3):789-94.
Pfister SA, Deckart A, Laschke S, Dellas S, Otto U, et al. Unenhanced helical computed tomography vs intravenous urography in patients with acute flank pain: accuracy and economic impact in a randomized prospective trial. Eur Radiol. 2003; 13 (11):2513-20. doi: 10.1007/s00330-003-1937-1.
Sheafor DH, Hertzberg BS, Freed KS, Carroll BA, Keogan MT, et al. Nonenhanced helical CT and US in the emergency evaluation of patients with renal colic: prospective comparison. Radiology. 2000; 217 (3):792-7.
Smith-Bindman R, Aubin C, Bailitz J, Bengiamin RN, Camargo CA. Jr, et al. Ultrasonography versus computed tomography for suspected nephrolithiasis. N Engl J Med. 2014; 371 (12):1100- 10. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1404446.
Levine JA, Neitlich J, Verga M, Dalrymple N, Smith RC. Ureteral calculi in patients with flank pain: correlation of plain radiography with unenhanced helical CT. Radiology. 1997; 204 (1):27-31.
El-Nahas AR, El-Assmy AM, Mansour O, Sheir KZ. A prospective multivariate analysis of factors predicting stone disintegration by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: the value of high- resolution noncontrast computed tomography. Eur Urol. 2007; 51 (6):1688-93.
Patel T, Kozakowski K, Hruby G, Gupta M. Skin to stone distance is an independent predictor of stone-free status following shockwave lithotripsy. J Endourol. 2009; 23 (9):1383-5. doi: 10.1089/end.2009.0394.
Zarse CA, Hameed TA, Jackson ME, Pishchalnikov YA Lingeman JE, et al. CT visible internal stone structure, but not Hounsfield unit value, of calcium oxalate monohydrate (COM) calculi predicts lithotripsy fragility in vitro. Urol Res. 2007; 35 (4): с.201-6. doi: 10.1007/s00240- 007-0104-6.
Schwartz BF, Schenkman N, Armenakas NA, Stoller ML. Imaging characteristics of indinavir calculi. J Urol. 1999; 161 (4):1085-7.
Sourtzis S, Thibeau JF, Damry N, Raslan A, Vandendris M, et al. Radiologic investigation of renal colic: unenhanced helical CT compared with excretory urography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999; 172 (6):1491-4.
Niall O, Russell J, MacGregor R, Duncan H, Mullins J. A comparison of noncontrast computerized tomography with excretory urography in the assessment of acute flank pain. J Urol. 1999; 161 (2):534-7.
Wang JH, Shen SH, Huang SS, Chang CY. Prospective comparison of unenhanced spiral computed tomography and intravenous urography in the evaluation of acute renal colic. J Chin Med Assoc. 2008; 71 (1): с.30-36. doi: 10.1016/S1726-4901(08)70069-8.
Shine S. Urinary calculus: IVU vs. CT renal stone? A critically appraised topic. Abdom Imaging. 2008; 33 (1): с.41-3.
Ulusan S, Koc Z, Tokmak N. Accuracy of sonography for detecting renal stone: comparison with CT. J Clin Ultrasound. 2007; 35 (5): с.256-61. doi: 10.1002/ jcu.20347
Caoili EM, Cohan RH, Korobkin M, Platt JF, Francis IR, Faerber GJ, Montie JE, Ellis JH. Urinary tract abnormalities: initial experience with multi-detector row CT urography. Radiology. 2002; 222 (2):353-60.
Thomson JM, Glocer J, Abbott C, Maling TM, Mark S. Computed tomography versus intravenous urography in diagnosis of acute flank pain from urolithiasis: a randomized study comparing imaging costs and radiation dose. Australas Radiol. 2001; 45 (3):291-7.
Poletti PA. Platon A, Rutschmann OT, Schmidlin FR, Iselin CE, et al. Lowdose versus standard-dose CT protocol in patients with clinically suspected renal colic. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007; 188 (4):927-33. doi: 10.2214/ AJR.06.0793.
Kluner C, Hein PA, Gralla O, Hein E, Hamm B, et al. Does ultra-low-dose CT with a radiation dose equivalent to that of KUB suffice to detect renal and ureteral calculi? J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2006; 30 (1):44-50.
Jellison FC, Smith JC, Heldt JP, Spengler NM, Nicolay LI, et al. Effect of low dose radiation computerized tomography protocols on distal ureteral calculus detection. J Urol. 2009; 182 (6):2762-7. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.08.042.
Niemann T, Kollmann T, Bongartz G. Diagnostic performance of low-dose CT for the detection of urolithiasis: a meta-analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008; 191 (2):396- 401. doi: 10.2214/AJR.07.3414.
Xiang H, Chan M, Brown V, Huo YR, Chan L, et al. Systematic review and metaanalysis of the diagnostic accuracy of low-dose computed tomography of the kidneys, ureters and bladder for urolithiasis. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2017; 61 (5):582-590. doi: 10.1111/1754-9485.12587.
Mancini JG, Ferrandino MN. The impact of new methods of imaging on radiation dosage delivered to patients. Curr Opin Urol. 2010; 20 (2):163-8. doi: 10.1097/ MOU.0b013e3283353bd9. 67. McCollough CH, Primak AN, Braun N, Kofler J, Yu L, Christner J. Strategies for reducing radiation dose in CT. Radiol Clin North Am. 2009;№47 (1):27-40. doi: 10.1016/j.rcl.2008.10.006.
Mulkens TH, Daineffe S, De Wijngaert R, Bellinck P, Leonard A, et al. Urinary stone disease: comparison of standard-dose and low-dose with 4D MDCT tube current modulation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007; 188 (2):553-62. doi: 10.2214/ AJR.05.1863
Kim BS, Hwang IK, Choi YW, Namkung S, Kim HC, et al. Low-dose and standarddose unenhanced helical computed tomography for the assessment of acute renal colic: prospective comparative study. Acta Radiol. 2005; 46 (7):756-63.
Kawashima A, Sandler CM, Ernst RD, Tamm EP, Goldman SM, et al. CT evaluation of renovascular disease. Radiographics. 2000; 20 (5):1321-40. doi: 10.1148/ radiograp hics.20.5.g00se141321
Agochukwu N, Huber S, Spektor M, Goehler A, Israel GM. Differentiating Renal Neoplasms From Simple Cysts on Contrast-Enhanced CT on the Basis of Attenuation and Homogeneity. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017; 208 (4):801-804. doi: 10.2214/AJR.16.17119.
Schiappacasse G, Aguirre J, Soffia P, Silva CS, Zilleruelo N. CT findings of the main pathological conditions associated with horseshoe kidneys. Br J Radiol. 2015; 88 (1045):20140456. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20140456.
Rao PN. Imaging for kidney stones. World J Urol. 2004; 22 (5):323-7. doi: 10.1007/s00345- 004-0413-0.
Ray AA, Ghiculete D, Pace KT, Honey RJ. Limitations to ultrasound in the detection and measurement of urinary tract calculi. Urology. 2010; 76 (2):295-300. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.12.015.
Chua ME, Gomez OR, Sapno LD, Lim SL, Morales ML.Jr. Use of computed tomography scout film and Hounsfield unit of computed tomography scan in predicting the radio-opacity of urinary calculi in plain kidney, ureter and bladder radiographs. Urol Ann. 2014; 6 (3):218-23. doi: 10.4103/0974-7796.134270.
Jackman SV, Potter SR, Regan F, Jarrett TW. Plain abdominal x-ray versus computerized tomography screening: sensitivity for stone localization after nonenhanced spiral computerized tomography. J Urol. 2000; 164 (2):308-10.
Heidenreich A, Desgrandschamps F, Terrier F. Modern approach of diagnosis and management of acute flank pain: review of all imaging modalities. Eur Urol. 2002; 41 (4):351-62.
Mutgi A, Williams JW, Nettleman M. Renal colic. Utility of the plain abdominal roentgenogram. Arch Intern Med. 1991; 151 (8):1589-92.
Kennish SJ, Bhatnagar P, Wah TM, Bush S, Irving HC. Is the KUB radiograph redundant for investigating acute ureteric colic in the non-contrast enhanced computed tomography era? Clin Radiol. 2008; 63 (10):1131-5. doi: 10.1016/j. crad.2008.04.012.
Campschroer T, Zhu X, Vernooij RW, Lock MT.WT. Alpha-blockers as medical expulsive therapy for ureteral stones. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2018; (4): CD008509. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008509.pub3.
Furyk JS, Chu K, Banks C, Greenslade J, Keijzers G, Thom O, et al. Distal Ureteric Stones and Tamsulosin: A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized, Multicenter Trial. Ann Emerg Med. 2016 Jan;67(1):86-95.e2. doi: 10.1016/j. annemergmed.2015.06.001. Epub 2015 Jul 17. PMID: 26194935.
Lucarelli G, Ditonno P, Bettocchi C, Grandaliano G, Gesualdo L, et al. Delayed relief of ureteral obstruction is implicated in the long-term development of renal damage and arterial hypertension in patients with unilateral ureteral injury. J Urol. 2013; 189 (3):960-5. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.08.242.
Hsu YP, Hsu CW, Bai CH, Cheng SW, Chen KC, et al. Silodosin versus tamsulosin for medical expulsive treatment of ureteral stones: A systematic review and metaanalysis. PLoS One. 2018; 13 (8):e0203035. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203035.
Liatsikos EN, Katsakiori PF, Assimakopoulos K, Voudoukis T, Kallidonis P, et al. Doxazosin for the management of distal-ureteral stones. J Endourol. 2007; 21 (5):538-41. doi: 10.1089/end.2006.0107.
Hollingsworth JM, Rogers MA, Kaufman SR, Bradford TJ, Saint S, et al. Medical therapy to facilitate urinary stone passage: a meta-analysis. Lancet. 2006; 368 (9542):1171-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69474-9.
Lojanapiwat B, Kochakarn W, Suparatchatpan N, Lertwuttichaikul K. Effectiveness of low- dose and standard-dose tamsulosin in the treatment of distal ureteric stones: a randomized controlled study. J Int Med Res. 2008; 36 (3):529-36. doi: 10.1177/147323000803600318.
Wang CJ, Huang SW, Chang CH. Efficacy of an alpha1 blocker in expulsive therapy of lower ureteral stones. J Endourol. 2008; 22 (1): с.41-46. doi: 10.1089/ end.2007.0133.
Kaneko T, Matsushima H, Morimoto H, Tsuzaka Y, Homma Y. Efficacy of low dose tamsulosin in medical expulsive therapy for ureteral stones in Japanese male patients: a randomized controlled study. Int J Urol. 2010; 17 (5):462-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2010.02499.x.
Yilmaz E, Batislam E, Basar MM, Tuglu D, Ferhat M, et al. The comparison and efficacy of 3 different alpha1-adrenergic blockers for distal ureteral stones. J Urol. 2005; 173 (6): с.2010-2. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000158453.60029.0a. 90. Zehri AA, Ather MH, Abbas F, Biyabani SR. Preliminary study of efficacy of doxazosin as a medical expulsive therapy of distal ureteric stones in a randomized clinical trial. Urology. 2010; 75 (6): с.1285-8. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.10.069.
Mohseni MG, Hosseini SR, Alizadeh F. Efficacy of terazosin as a facilitator agent for expulsion of the lower ureteral stones. Saudi Med J. 2006; 27 (6):838-40.
Agrawal M, Gupta M, Gupta A, Agrawal A, Sarkari A, et al. Prospective randomized trial comparing efficacy of alfuzosin and tamsulosin in management of lower ureteral stones. Urology. 2009; 73 (4):706–709. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2008.11.013.
Pedro RN, Hinck B, Hendlin K, Feia K, Canales BK, et al. Alfuzosin stone expulsion therapy for distal ureteral calculi: a double-blind, placebo controlled study. J Urol. 2008; 179 (6):2244-7. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.01.141.
Ahmed AF, Al-Sayed AY. Tamsulosin versus Alfuzosin in the Treatment of Patients with Distal Ureteral Stones: Prospective, Randomized, Comparative Study. Korean J Urol. 2010; 51 (3):193-7. doi: 10.4111/kju.2010.51.3.193.
Chau LH, Tai DC, Fung BT, Li JC, Fan CW, et al. Medical expulsive therapy using alfuzosin for patient presenting with ureteral stone less than 10mm: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Int J Urol. 2011; 18 (7):510-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2011.02780.x.
Tsuzaka Y, Matsushima H, Kaneko T, Yamaguchi T, Homma Y. Naftopidil vs silodosin in medical expulsive therapy for ureteral stones: a randomized controlled study in Japanese male patients. Int J Urol. 2011; 18 (11): с.792-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2011.02850.x.
Itoh Y, Okada A, Yasui T, Hamamoto S, Hirose M, et al. Efficacy of selective α1A adrenoceptor antagonist silodosin in the medical expulsive therapy for ureteral stones. Int J Urol. 2011; 18 (9):672-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2011.02810.x.
Sairam K. Should we SUSPEND MET? Not really. Cent European J Urol. 2016; 69 (2):183. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2016.864.
Rodman JS, Williams JJ, Peterson CM. Dissolution of uric acid calculi. J Urol. 1984; 131 (6):1039-44.
Becker G. The CARI guidelines. Kidney stones: uric acid stones. Nephrology (Carlton). 2007; 12 (1):21-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1797.2007.00774.x.
Bultitude M, Rees J. Management of renal colic. BMJ. 2012; 345:e5499. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e5499.
El-Gamal O, El-Bendary M, Ragab M, Rasheed M. Role of combined use of potassium citrate and tamsulosin in the management of uric acid distal ureteral calculi. Urol Res. 2012; 40 (3):219 24. doi: 10.1007/s00240-011-0406-6.
Preminger GM, Tiselius HG, Assimos DG, Alken P, Buck AC, et al. 2007 Guideline for the management of ureteral calculi. Eur Urol. 2007; 52 (6):1610- 31.
Skolarikos A, Laguna MP, Alivizatos G, Kural AR, de la Rosette J.J. The role for active monitoring in urinary stones: a systematic review. J Endourol. 2010; 24 (6):923-30. doi: 10.1089/end.2009.0670.
Skolarikos A, Mitsogiannis H, Deliveliotis C. Indications, prediction of success and methods to improve outcome of shock wave lithotripsy of renal and upper ureteral calculi. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2010; 82 (1):56-63.
Pearle MS. Pierce HL, Miller GL, Summa JA, Mutz JM, et al. Optimal method of urgent decompression of the collecting system for obstruction and infection due to ureteral calculi. J Urol. 1998; 160 (4):1260-4.
Mokhmalji H, Braun PM, Martinez Portillo FJ, Siegsmund M, Alken P, et al. Percutaneous nephrostomy versus ureteral stents for diversion of hydronephrosis caused by stones: a prospective, randomized clinical trial. J Urol. 2001; 165 (4):1088-92.
Yoshimura K, Utsunomiya N, Ichioka K, Ueda N, Matsui Y, et al. Emergency drainage for urosepsis associated with upper urinary tract calculi. J Urol. 2005; 173 (2):458-62. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000150512.40102.bb.
Ramsey S, Robertson A, Ablett MJ, Meddings RN, Hollins GW, et al. Evidencebased drainage of infected hydronephrosis secondary to ureteric calculi. J Endourol. 2010; 24 (2):185- 9. doi: 10.1089/end.2009.0361.
Иванов ВЮ, Малхасян ВА, Семенякин ИВ, Гаджиев НК, Тедеев АВ, и др. Выбор оптимального метода дренирования верхних мочевых путей при остром обструктивном пиелонефрите. Экспериментальная и клиническая урология. 2017; 1:58-67. / Ivanov VYu, Malhasyan VA, Semenyakin IV, Gadzhiev NK, Tedeev AV, Pushkar’ DYu. Choice of the optimal method of upper urinary tract drainage in patients with acute obstructive pyelonephritis. Experimental and clinical urology. 2017; 1:58-67. (In Russian).
Marien T, Mass AY, Shah O. Antimicrobial resistance patterns in cases of obstructive pyelonephritis secondary to stones. Urology. 2015; 85 (1):64-8. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.10.007.
Mariappan P, Loong CW. Midstream urine culture and sensitivity test is a poor predictor of infected urine proximal to the obstructing ureteral stone or infected stones: a prospective clinical study. J Urol. 2004; 171 (6):2142-5.
Naboka YL, Gudima IA, Mitusova EV, Bedzhanyan SK, Morgun PP. Antimicrobial resistance of uropathogens in patients with acute obstructive pyelonephritis. Urologiia. 2017; 4:27-31.
Pasiechnikov S, Buchok O, Sheremeta R, Banyra O. Empirical treatment in patients with acute obstructive pyelonephritis. Infect Disord Drug Targets. 2015; 15 (3):163-70.
Vahlensieck W, Friess D, Fabry W, Waidelich R, Bschleipfer T. Long-term results after acute therapy of obstructive pyelonephritis. Urol Int. 2015; 94 (4):436-41. doi: 10.1159/000368051.
Wagenlehner FM, Tandogdu Z, Bjerklund Johansen TE. An update on classification and management of urosepsis. Curr Opin Urol. 2017; 27 (2):133- 137. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000364.
Wagenlehner FM, Lichtenstern C, Rolfes C, Mayer K, Uhle F, et al. Diagnosis and management for urosepsis. Int J Urol. 2013; 20 (10):963-70. doi: 10.1111/ iju.12200.
Wagenlehner FM, Pilatz A, Weidner W. Urosepsis – from the view of the urologist. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2011; 38:51-57. doi: 10.1016/j. ijantimicag.2011.09.007.
Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Carlet JM. et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2008. Crit Care Med. 2008; 36 (1):296-327.
Малхасян ВА, Иванов ВЮ, Ходырева ЛА, Дударева АА, Куприянов ЮА, и др. Анализ оказания специализированной медицинской помощи пациентам с острым обструктивным пиелонефритом в урологических стационарах г. Москвы. Экспериментальная и клиническая урология. 2016; 4:26-30. / Malhasyan VA, Ivanov VYu, Hodyreva LA, Dudareva AA, Kupriyanov YuA, Red’kovich VI, et al. Analysis of specialized medical care to patients with acute obstructive pyelonephritis in Moscow urological hospitals. Experimental and clinical urology. 2016; 4:26-30. (In Russian).
Cui X, Ji F, Yan H, Ou TW, Jia CS, et al. Comparison between extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopic lithotripsy for treating large proximal ureteral stones: a meta- analysis. Urology. 2015; 85 (4):748-56. doi: 10.1016/j. urology.2014.11.041.
Drake T, Grivas N, Dabestani S, Knoll T, Lam T, et al. What are the Benefits and Harms of Ureteroscopy Compared with Shock-wave Lithotripsy in the Treatment of Upper Ureteral Stones? A Systematic Review. Eur Urol. 2017; 72 (5):772-786. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.04.016.
Aboumarzouk OM, Kata SG, Keeley FX, McClinton S, Nabi G. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus ureteroscopic management for ureteric calculi. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012; №16 (5):CD006029.
Xu Y, Lu Y, Li J, Luo S, Liu Y, et al. A meta-analysis of the efficacy of ureteroscopic lithotripsy and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy on ureteral calculi. Acta Cir Bras. 2014; 29 (5):346-52.
Ishii H, Couzins M, Aboumarzouk O, Biyani CS, Somani BK. Outcomes of Systematic Review of Ureteroscopy for Stone Disease in the Obese and Morbidly Obese Population. J Endourol. 2016; 30 (2):135-45. doi: 10.1089/ end.2015.0547.
Delakas D, Karyotis I, Daskalopoulos G, Lianos E, Mavromanolakis E. Independent predictors of failure of shockwave lithotripsy for ureteral stones employing a second-generation lithotripter. J Endourol. 2003; 17 (4):201-5.
Yang C, Li S, Cui Y. Comparison of YAG Laser Lithotripsy and Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy in Treatment of Ureteral Calculi: A Meta-Analysis. Urol Int. 2017; 98 (4):373-381. doi: 10.1159/000452610.
Ouzaid I, Al-qahtani S, Dominique S, Hupertan V, Fernandez P, et al. A 970 Hounsfield units (HU) threshold of kidney stone density on non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) improves patients“ selection for extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL): evidence from a prospective study. BJU Int. 2012; 110 (11):438-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.10964.x.
Shinde S, Al Balushi Y, Hossny M, Jose S, Al Busaidy S. Factors Affecting the Outcome of Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy in Urinary Stone Treatment. Oman Med J. 2018; 33 (3):209-217. doi: 10.5001/omj.2018.39.
Razvi H, Fuller A, Nott L, Méndez-Probst CE, Leistner R, et al. Risk factors for perinephric hematoma formation after shockwave lithotripsy: a matched casecontrol analysis. J Endourol. 2012; 26 (11):1478-82. doi: 10.1089/end.2012.0261.
Schnabel MJ, Gierth M, Bründl J, Chaussy CG, Burger M. et al. Antiplatelet and anticoagulative medication during shockwave lithotripsy. J Endourol. 2014; 28 (9):1034-9. doi: 10.1089/end.2014.0162.
Elkoushy MA, Violette PD, Andonian S. Ureteroscopy in patients with coagulopathies is associated with lower stone-free rate and increased risk of clinically significant hematuria. Int Braz J Urol. 2012; 38 (2):195-202.
Watterson JD, Girvan AR, Cook AJ, Beiko DT, Nott L, et al. Safety and efficacy of holmium: YAG laser lithotripsy in patients with bleeding diatheses. J Urol. 2002; 168 (2):442-5.
Aboumarzouk OM, Somani BK, Monga M. Flexible ureteroscopy and holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy for stone disease in patients with bleeding diathesis: a systematic review of the literature. Int Braz J Urol. 2012; 38(3):298-305.
Toepfer NJ, Baylor K, Henry Y, Simmons J, Berger PB. The effect of antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy on the clinical outcome of patients undergoing ureteroscopy. Urology. 2013;82 (4):773-9. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.05.019.
Turna B, Stein RJ, Smaldone MC, Santos BR, Kefer JC, et al. Safety and efficacy of flexible ureterorenoscopy and holmium:YAG lithotripsy for intrarenal stones in anticoagulated cases. J Urol. 2008; 179 (4):1415-9. doi: 10.1016/j. juro.2007.11.076.
Sharaf A, Amer T, Somani BK, Aboumarzouk OM. Ureteroscopy in Patients with Bleeding Diatheses, Anticoagulated, and on Anti-Platelet Agents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Literature. J Endourol. 2017; 31 (12):1217-1225. doi: 10.1089/end.2017.0253.
Wang Q, Guo J, Hu H, Lu Y, Zhang J, et al. Rigid ureteroscopic lithotripsy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for large proximal ureteral stones: A meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2017; 12 (2): e0171478. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171478.
Wang Y, Zhong B, Yang X, Wang G, Hou P, et al. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of URSL, RPLU, and MPCNL for treatment of large upper impacted ureteralstones: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Urol. 2017; 17 (1): 50. doi: 10.1186/ s12894-017-0236-0.
Wu T, Duan X, Chen S, Yang X, Tang T, Cui S. Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy versus Laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy or Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in the Management of Large Proximal Ureteral Stones: A Systematic Review and Meta- Analysis. Urol Int. 2017; 99 (3):308- 319. doi: 10.1159/000471773.
Topaloglu H, Karakoyunlu N, Sari S, Ozok HU, Sagnak L, et al. A comparison of antegrade percutaneous and laparoscopic approaches in the treatment of proximal ureteral stones. Biomed Res Int. 2014; 2014:691946. doi: 10.1155/2014/691946.
Prakash J, Singh V, Kumar M, Kumar M, Sinha RJ, et al. Retroperitoneoscopic versus open mini-incision ureterolithotomy for upper- and mid-ureteric stones: a prospective randomized study. Urolithiasis. 2014; 42 (2):133-9. doi: 10.1007/ s00240-013-0624-1.
Skolarikos A, Papatsoris AG, Albanis S, Assimos D. Laparoscopic urinary stone surgery: an updated evidence-based review. Urol Res. 2010; 38 (5):337-44. doi: 10.1007/s00240-010-0275-4.
Kumar A, Vasudeva P, Nanda B, Kumar N, Jha SK, Singh H. A Prospective Randomized Comparison Between Laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy and Semirigid Ureteroscopy for Upper Ureteral Stones >2 cm: A Single-Center Experience. J Endourol. 2015; 29 (11):1248-52. doi: 10.1089/end.2013.0791.
Torricelli FC, Monga M, Marchini GS, Srougi M, Nahas WC, Mazzucchi E. Semirigid ureteroscopic lithotripsy versus laparoscopic ureterolithotomy for large upper ureteral stones: a meta – analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int Braz J Urol. 2016; 42 (4):645-54. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2015.0696.
Kallidonis P, Ntasiotis P, Knoll T, Sarica K, Papatsoris A, et al. Minimally Invasive Surgical Ureterolithotomy Versus Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy for Large Ureteric Stones: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Literature. Eur Urol Focus. 2017; 3 (6):554-566. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2017.04.006.
Sun X, Xia S, Lu J, Liu H, Han B, et al. Treatment of large impacted proximal ureteral stones: randomized comparison of percutaneous antegrade ureterolithotripsy versus retrograde ureterolithotripsy. J Endourol. 2008; 22 (5):913-7. doi: 10.1089/end.2007.0230.
Moufid K, Abbaka N, Touiti D, Adermouch L, Amine M, Lezrek M. Large impacted upper ureteral calculi: A comparative study between retrograde ureterolithotripsy and percutaneous antegrade ureterolithotripsy in the modified lateral position. Urol Ann. 2013; 5 (3):140-6. doi: 10.4103/0974-7796.115729
El-Nahas AR, Eraky I el-Assmy AM, Shoma AM, el-Kenawy MR, Abdel-Latif M, et al. Percutaneous treatment of large upper tract stones after urinary diversion. Urology. 2006; 68 (3):500-4.
El-Assmy A, El-Nahas AR, Mohsen T, Eraky I, El-Kenawy MR Shaban AA, Sheir KZ. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of upper urinary tract calculi in patients with cystectomy and urinary diversion. Urology. 2005; 66 (3):510-3.
Honeck P, Wendt-Nordahl G, Krombach P, Bach T, Häcker A, et al. Does open stone surgery still play a role in the treatment of urolithiasis? Data of a primary urolithiasis center. J Endourol. 2009; 23 (7):1209-12. doi: 10.1089/end.2009.0027.
Ohmori K, Matsuda T, Horii Y, Yoshida O. Effects of shock waves on the mouse fetus. J Urol. 1994; 151 (1):255-8.
Smith DP, Graham JB, Prystowsky JB, Dalkin BL, Nemcek AA. Jr. The effects of ultrasound-guided shock waves during early pregnancy in Sprague-Dawley rats. J Urol. 1992; 147 (1):231-4.
Chaussy CG, Fuchs GJ. Current state and future developments of noninvasive
treatment of human urinary stones with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol. 1989; 141:782–789.
Mira Moreno A, Montoya Lirola MD, García Tabar PJ, Galiano Baena JF, Tenza Incidence of infectious complications after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in patients without associated risk factors. J Urol. 2014; 192 (5):1446-9. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.05.091.
Honey RJ, Ordon M, Ghiculete D, Wiesenthal JD, Kodama R, et al. A prospective study examining the incidence of bacteriuria and urinary tract infection after shock wave lithotripsy with targeted antibiotic prophylaxis. J Urol. 2013; 189 (6):2112-7. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.12.063.
Lee SW, Yoon S, Do J, et al. The risk factors of recurrent febrile urinary tract
infection within 1 year in urinary stone patients with acute obstructive pyelonephritis. Urogenital Tract Infect. 2017; 12:82-8.
Westh H, Knudsen F, Hedengran AM, Weischer M, Mogensen P, et al. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of kidney stones does not induce transient bacteremia. A prospective study. The Copenhagen Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy Study Group. J Urol. 1990; 144 (1): 15-6.
Duvdevani M, Lorber G, Gofrit ON, Latke A, Katz R, et al. Fever after shockwave lithotripsy – risk factors and indications for prophylactic antimicrobial treatment. J Endourol. 2010; 24 (2):277-81. doi: 10.1089/end.2009.0283.
Streem SB, Yost A. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in patients with bleeding diatheses. J Urol. 1990; 144 (6):1347-8.
Klingler HC, Kramer G, Lodde M, Dorfinger K, Hofbauer J, et al. Stone treatment and coagulopathy. Eur Urol. 2003; 43 (1):75-9.
Ruiz H, Saltzman B. Aspirin-induced bilateral renal hemorrhage after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy therapy: implications and conclusions. J Urol. 1990; 143 (4):791-2.
Knorr PA, Woodside JR. Large perirenal hematoma after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy. Urology. 1990; 35 (2):151-3.
Sare GM, Lloyd FR, Stower MJ. Life-threatening haemorrhage after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in a patient taking clopidogrel. BJU Int. 2002; 90 (4):469.
Alsaikhan B, Andonian S. Shock wave lithotripsy in patients requiring anticoagulation or antiplatelet agents. Can Urol Assoc J. 2011; 5:53–57. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.09140.
Rechenmacher SJ Fang JC. Bridging Anticoagulation: Primum Non Nocere. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015; 66 (12):1392-403. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.08.002.
Altay B, Erkurt B, Albayrak S. A review study to evaluate holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy with flexible ureteroscopy in patients on ongoing oral anticoagulant therapy. Lasers Med Sci. 2017; 32 (7):1615-1619. doi: 10.1007/s10103-017- 2289-4.
Carey SW, Streem SB. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for patients with calcified ipsilateral renal arterial or abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Urol. 1992; 148 (1):18-20.
Vasavada SP, Streem SB, Kottke-Marchant K, Novick AC. Pathological effects of extracorporeally generated shock waves on calcified aortic aneurysm tissue. J Urol. 1994; 152 (1):45-8.
Tse GH, Qazi HA, Halsall AK, Nalagatla SR. Shockwave lithotripsy: arterial aneurysms and vascular complications. J Endourol. 2011; 25 (3):403-11. doi: 10.1089/end.2010.0355.
Wang H, Man L, Li G, Huang G, Liu N, et al. Meta-Analysis of Stenting versus Non- Stenting for the Treatment of Ureteral Stones. PLoS One. 2017; 12 (1):e0167670. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0167670.
Shen P, Jiang M, Yang J, Li X, Li Y, et al. Use of ureteral stent in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for upper urinary calculi: a systematic review and metaanalysis. J Urol. 2011; 186 (4):1328-35. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.05.073.
Musa AA. Use of double-J stents prior to extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy is not beneficial: results of a prospective randomized study. Int Urol Nephrol. 2008; 40 (1):19-22. doi: 10.1007/s11255-006-9030-8
Ghoneim IA, El-Ghoneimy MN, El-Naggar AE, Hammoud KM, El-Gammal MY, et al. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in impacted upper ureteral stones: a prospective randomized comparison between stented and non-stented techniques. Urology. 2010; 75 (1):45- 50. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.06.071.
Lu Y, Tianyong F, Ping H, Qiang W. Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Shock Wave Lithotripsy in Patients with Sterile Urine Before Treatment May be Unnecessary: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Urol. 2012; 14: S0022-5347(12)04900-2. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.08.215.
Bootsma AM, Laguna Pes MP, Geerlings SE, Goossens A. Antibiotic prophylaxis in urologic procedures: a systematic review. Eur Urol. 2008; 54 (6):1270-86. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.03.033.
Alexander CE, Gowland S, Cadwallader J, et al. Routine antibiotic prophylaxis is not required for patients undergoing shockwave lithotripsy: outcomes from a national shockwave lithotripsy database in New Zealand. J Endourol. 2016; 30:1233–8.
Wollin DA, Joyce AD, Gupta M, Wong MYC, Laguna P, et al. Antibiotic use and the prevention and management of infectious complications in stone disease. World J Urol. 2017; 35 (9):1369-1379. doi: 10.1007/s00345-017-2005-9.
i K., Lin T, Zhang C, Fan X, Xu K, et al. Optimal frequency of shock wave lithotripsy in urolithiasis treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Urol. 2013; 190 (4):1260-7. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.03.075.
Semins MJ, Trock BJ, Matlaga BR. The effect of shock wave rate on the outcome of shock wave lithotripsy: a meta-analysis. J Urol. 2008; 179 (1):194-7. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.08.173
Connors BA, Evan AP, Blomgren PM, Handa RK, Willis LR, et al. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy at 60 shock waves/min reduces renal injury in a porcine model. BJU Int. 2009; 104 (7):1004-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08520.x
Connors BA, Evan AP, Blomgren PM, Handa RK, Willis LR, et al. Effect of initial shock wave voltage on shock wave lithotripsy-induced lesion size during step-wise voltage ramping. BJU Int. 2009; 103 (1):104-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.07922.x.
Handa RK, McAteer JA, Connors BA, Liu Z, Lingeman JE, et al. Optimising an escalating shockwave amplitude treatment strategy to protect the kidney from injury during shockwave lithotripsy. BJU Int. 2012; 110 (11):1041-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11207.x.
Skuginna V, Nguyen DP, Seiler R, Kiss B, Thalmann GN, et al. Does Stepwise Voltage Ramping Protect the Kidney from Injury During Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy? Results of a Prospective Randomized Trial. Eur Urol. 2016; 69 (2): с.267-73. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.06.017.
Maloney ME, Marguet CG, Zhou Y, Kang DE, Sung JC, et al. Progressive Increase of Lithotripter Output Produces Better in-Vivo Stone Comminution. J Endourol. 2006; 20 (9): 603– 606. doi: 10.1089/end.2006.20.603
Demirci D, Sofikerim M, Yalçin E, Ekmekçioğlu O, Gülmez I, et al. Comparison of conventional and step-wise shockwave lithotripsy in management of urinary calculi. J Endourol. 2007; 21 (12):1407-10.
Pishchalnikov YA, Neucks JS, VonDerHaar RJ, Pishchalnikova IV, Williams JC. Jr, et al. Air pockets trapped during routine coupling in dry head lithotripsy can significantly decrease the delivery of shock wave energy. J Urol. 2006; 176 (6):2706-10. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.07.149.

Выпуск

№ 3, Том 8 (2020)

Кол-во страниц: 33 страницы

Издательство

Издательство: Династия
Регион: Россия, Москва
Почтовый адрес: 117149, г. Москва, ул. Азовская, д.6, к.3, офис 8/2
Юр. адрес: 117149, г. Москва, вн.тер.г. Муниципальный округ Зюзино, ул. Азовская, д.6, к.3, этаж,блок 8,8/2, помещ.12
ФИО: Макарова Татьяна Владимировна (Директор)
E-mail адрес: red@phdynasty.ru
Контактный телефон: +7 (495) 6606004
Сайт: https://www.phdynasty.ru

Все права на тексты и товарные знаки принадлежат их законным владельцам. Подробнее...

Сайт https://scinetwork.ru (далее – сайт) работает по принципу агрегатора – собирает и структурирует информацию из публичных источников в сети Интернет, то есть передает полнотекстовую информацию о товарных знаках в том виде, в котором она содержится в открытом доступе.

Сайт и администрация сайта не используют отображаемые на сайте товарные знаки в коммерческих и рекламных целях, не декларируют своего участия в процессе их государственной регистрации, не заявляют о своих исключительных правах на товарные знаки, а также не гарантируют точность, полноту и достоверность информации.

Все права на товарные знаки принадлежат их законным владельцам!

Сайт носит исключительно информационный характер, и предоставляемые им сведения являются открытыми публичными данными.

Администрация сайта не несет ответственность за какие бы то ни было убытки, возникающие в результате доступа и использования сайта.

Спасибо, понятно.